Harold and Maude (1971) opens with young Harold, played by Bud Cort,
enacting one of his elaborately staged faux suicides, part of an ongoing, splendidly morbid
art project for an audience of one: his mom. Okay, two if you count Harold
himself, a Goth avant la lettre, with
a pale, round face and a bowl cut that makes him look like he’s 12, though Cort
was 20 at the time of filming. Harold hangs himself in the parlour, but his mom
barely even notices. “Try to be a little more vivacious,” Mother suggests in
withering tones, speaking in one of the film’s many puzzling Transatlantic
accents. (It all takes place in the Bay Area.) Given the oppressive mother-son
relationship and Harold’s shyness that hides a very, very dark streak, I find
it hard to go back to the film for the first time in many years (the occasion
being Criterion’s handsome new DVD/Blu-ray release) and not instantly think of
Norman Bates. I must not be the only one to make the connection because many
years later Cort would play a mentally disturbed parent-killer who inherits
Norman’s property in the TV movie (and would-be series pilot) Bates Motel (1987).
If you don’t know
this story already, Harold and Maude chronicles
a love affair between Cort’s death-obsessed rich kid and a nearly octogenarian,
wildly eccentric, always smiling, life-loving, funeral-frequenting Holocaust
survivor who lives in a train and who’s also a car thief and drives like she
wants to die spectacularly and take as many people with her as possible. That’s
Maude. She’s played by Ruth Gordon, who was so truly, deeply frightening, as
well as hilarious, in Rosemary’s Baby
(1968), for which she got the Oscar, and it’s such a curious thing to see her
behave so similarly in Harold and Maude and
yet be so utterly endearing. Her ongoing barrage of platitudes, most of which
are of the carpe diem, elder hippy
variety, stuff about singing and flowers and so forth, can grate on your nerves
a little, but if you surrender to the film’s vibe it’s hard not to see how
Harold could fall in love with her. Harold’s big on death and Maude’s relative
proximity to it is no doubt a key part of her allure. But she teaches him to
live. It’s sweet.
Hal Ashby’s
second feature received a half-assed release from Paramount and didn’t do good
box office at all, but it did become one hell of a cult film. By the time it
reached me a couple of decades later I was in my teens and it was presented to
me by an older girlfriend with the reverence one reserves for a first listen to
Dark Side of the Moon or the loss of
one’s teeth. People feel pretty strongly about Harold and Maude. I feel kindly enough toward it. I understand the
sentiment. I still shed a tear at the end. I think it works best on the young. It’s also pretty corny, very much of its time, very much a generation gap
movie, simply trading the “Don’t trust anyone over 30” mandate for “Don’t trust
anyone between 30 and 75.” The result of this sensibility is that every single
one of the supporting characters is a one-dimensional, one-joke, rather tedious
cartoon buffoon: the mom, the priest, the shrink, the one-armed uncle in the military.
Other than the two leads the only presence in the film that has any soul at all
is Cat Stevens, whose songs are lovingly woven into the film’s highly memorable
soundtrack and are rarely too on the nose.
Okay, actually
there’s one other exception: Tom Skerritt in his un-credited cameo as a
motorbike cop who tries to take Maude in on a reckless driving charge. His
character is a doofus too, and for some stupid reason his gun doesn’t even
work, but at least he tries to make something of his two goofy scenes and
doesn’t tremble or salivate when he talks. Tom Skerritt is awesome, in case you
forgot. I think Tom Skerritt should get a special award for playing more men in
uniform—see War Hunt (1962), M*A*S*H (1970), Fuzz (1972), The Dead Zone (1983),
Top Gun, Space Camp (both 1986), Knight
Moves (1992), Smoke Signals (1998),
Tears of the Sun (2003), or his roles
on shows like Combat (1962-67), Twelve O’Clock High (1964-67) or Picket Fences (1992-96), and that’s just
stuff I can remember—and playing them well, than perhaps any other postwar
actor in Hollywood.
No comments:
Post a Comment