Repeat after me: “War is
hell.” Now keep repeating that for over two hours and by the time you’re
finished you might have some idea as to the cumulative insights gathered in
David Ayer’s turgid World War II tank drama. It opens with U.S. tank commander Sergeant
Collier (Brad Pitt) stabbing a man in the eyeball, which, I suppose, is some
kind of clever performance of the title of Ayer’s preceding directorial effort,
End of Watch. But I had to review Fury, so I kept on watching, as bodies
were crushed to pulp under tank tread, as men on fire blew their brains out, as
prisoners of war were repeatedly executed, as women are humiliated and
surrender their bodies to invading soldiers because they know they have no
choice. (I’ll let you decide how that differs from sexual assault.) Mayhem
without energy, these dour scenes don’t even have the crassness to be perverse.
What it has instead and in droves is this appalling, pretentious mixture of
misanthropy and sentimentality, with endless peanut-brained justifications for
superfluous raping and killing. There’s a scene in which a newbie (Logan
Lerman), already traumatized by having to clean to clean up the bloody interior
of the tank and discovering a sizable chunk of someone’s face, is escorted by
Collier into a room littered with Nazis who suicided in anticipation of the
Allies’ arrival. As though speaking on our behalf, the newbie asks, “Why are
you showing me this?” And Collier, as though speaking on Ayers’ behalf,
answers, “Ideals are peaceful. History is violent.” This is the zenith of what
passes for wisdom in Fury.
If
Ayer’s aim is to remind us of the infernal horrors of what many consider a just
war (something that, for the record, countless, infinitely superior films have
accomplished before this), I suppose he’s succeeded, but he deflates whatever
value such a statement may possess by simultaneously constructing scenarios in
which his characters are made to seem heroic, striking heroic poses, saying
heroic things to the strains of heroic music. Which is to say, Fury is a dunderheaded apologia for war
crimes, a morally inept work of grotesque nonsense exploiting historical suffering
for the sake of pulpy so-called entertainment.
Fury is a fairly appropriate title (American
Tank might have served just as well), but Ayer’s definition of fury has
much overlap with stupidity or blunt nihilism. Collier proudly declares that he
once promised to keep his crew alive, yet the film ends with an act of utterly gratuitous
violence, a quasi-Wild Bunch climax
that’s sure to get everyone butchered for absolutely no good reason. It’s April
1945, the war is nearly over, a mechanical failure stalls Collier’s tank at a
country crossroads somewhere in Germany, hundreds of Nazis are spotted coming
their way. Outnumbered and outgunned by a colossal margin, Collier’s crew of
five could easily hide out in the woods, but instead choose to hold their
ground for no apparent reason other than to keep killing and keep getting
killed, to get that body-count as high as possible even when the war’s outcome
is all but secured.
That
Ayer has managed to make a film even stupider than End of Watch is some kind of achievement. That he manages to
exacerbate that stupidity with snatches of scoring from The Omen is almost, but not quite, impressive. Misguided in the
extreme and weirdly boring, there is no genuine audacity here, and certainly no
nobility. Of interest to tank enthusiasts and Shia LaBeouf completists only.
1 comment:
This is the stupidest 'review' I have ever read. You didn't like the movie, don't write about it. This isn't a review, it isn't even a critique; it has no content. You are ignorant of what the director showed.
You should see the movie again and maybe read about the war and see a few war documentaries beforehand for context.
Post a Comment