Was it only a dream?
Six-year-old Sam (Noah Wiseman) wakes up in the middle of the night and
scurries to his mother’s bed. He was having a nightmare, but so was Amelia
(Essie Davis), or so it seems during The
Babadook’s arresting, morbidly beautiful opening, in which we see Amelia,
head and shoulders fixed in the frame, surrounded by void, jostled as through
in an accident, then buoyed, eyes wide, as though suddenly submerged. Amelia’s
dream, we’ll eventually learn, is an echo of past experience, while Sam’s
bogeyman may just be something all too real.
What’s
real and what’s dream? In Australian director Jennifer Kent’s terrifyingly
confident debut the daylight drapes everything in a patina of realism, yet
those interiors, especially in Amelia’s house, with its blue walls, doors and
mouldings, possess an otherworldly dollhouse drabness, a little like Aki Kaurismaki’s
colour-noir lighting, except in this case the décors seem more in keeping with the
aesthetic of a sinister, austere children’s book. In The Babadook, just such a
book is the trigger for nightmares and waking life to merge into a single
stream.
The
best horror films for adults, I mean the ones that lodge themselves in some
corner of your psyche where rational thinking helplessly dissolves, are the
ones where the scariest things are the real things. In the first, best third of
The Babadook, nothing is scarier than
the notion of being a widowed single mother with a potentially monstrous
child—in certain ways, The Babadook
is the crisper, leaner version of Xavier Dolan’s Mommy. (It’s also strikingly similar in its themes to the recent
Austrian film Goodnight Mommy, which
I hope someone will screen here sometime soon.) Sam is turning into a menace in
his first grade classroom, and he’s just as unruly when Amelia takes him to
visit his relatives. What’s more, his nightmares have become nightly, driving
both he and Amelia batty with sleep deprivation. (Which I can tell you,
speaking as lifelong insomniac, is one of the ways that dreams and reality can
get troublingly blurred.) And when Amelia’s not struggling to control Sam’s
erratic, sometimes violent behaviour, she’s working in the dementia ward of a
nursing home, which isn’t going to help anyone’s grip on reality.
And
here’s one more turn of the screw: Sam’s birthday is also the anniversary of
his father’s death, and Amelia’s reluctance to celebrate it is one sign of her
protracted, debilitating grief—and such levels of grief, in the realm of The Babadook, can manifest as something
like demonic possession. Which is where Kent started to lose me a little. The
film’s title comes from a mysterious children’s book that might be stalking the
characters. A marvellous tension thrives in the film’s initial ambiguities.
Again: what’s dream?, what’s real?, what’s madness, anxiety, grief, trauma?
This is the sort of ambiguity that Roman Polanski excels at in films such as Repulsion and Rosemary’s Baby. The Babadook
thankfully never completely succumbs to horror-trope autopilot, but in the
over-extended hysteria of its climax it does start to feel a little too much
like The Ring 2. Anyway, I won’t
quibble too much. There’s enough here that gets under your skin and past the
guards of your unconscious, and Kent’s use of space, light, sound and
performance is very impressive. Whether you like spooky movies or not, watch
out for this name.
No comments:
Post a Comment