“We’re not savages. We’re English!” This
line, spoken early in Peter Brook’s Lord
of the Flies (1963), when the boys left stranded on a tropical island are
still keen to institute some version of democracy, gets at something about this
film I really like. Devoid of sound, image and behaviour, William Golding’s
source novel can be read as an allegory, about how any social order carries
within it the seeds of its own destruction, about how warlike instincts persist
in us, waiting for opportunity, or permission. But once Golding’s story is
rendered as cinema its inherent Englishness seems essential. The uniforms, the
classism, the faux-politesse, the naïve patriotism, the bragging over whose
father does what for a living: these elements endow the universality of Lord of the Flies with vivid
specificity. That balance is so often crucial to movies, which tend to become
flat striving blindly to speak for all. Lord
of the Flies is an exceptional film in numerous ways, and if you haven’t
seen it, Criterion has released it in an excellent new package on DVD and
Blu-ray.
It
opens with some extremely economical exposition: images of boys at private
school, in choir, at their dinner appear in a series of grainy stills made
grainier still when the camera zooms in. Then come images of rockets, an
evacuation notice, and planes. We’ve quickly been told all we need to know and
the real drama can begin, with Ralph (James Aubrey) and Piggy (Hugh Edwards)
traipsing through the jungles of the island on which they’ve been left to fend
for themselves. They soon find other boys, including a choir, who memorably
enter singing their way down the beach in their capes. Organization is deemed
key, and Ralph instantly wins the confidence of the others, becoming their
foreman, much to the chagrin of Jack (Tom Chapin), the choir leader, who with
time will wrestle control from Ralph and lead the others into precisely the
sort of savagery he disparaged in that remark quoted at the top of this column.
Jack’s a malevolent force in Lord of the
Flies, which builds to scenes of frenzied murder, but there is surely some other,
subversive version of this story in which we could imagine Jack as the antihero,
embracing the ancient call for ecstasy, blood-letting, dance and the
annihilation of every last vestige of soul-deadening civilization.
Brook
was introduced to producer Lewis Allen as “a con artist—but a con artist for
art.” He managed to convince an entire crew, none of who had made a feature, to
come to an actual island with a bunch of children, none of who were
professional actors, and make a movie with minimal resources. Despite such a
hubristic approach, the result exudes craft, precision and style: the
incorporation of music that varies from a flute-driven theme to primal drumming
to children singing ‘Kyrie eleison’;
the omnipresent landscape swaying and looming over and gradually transforming
the characters; the rays of light that break up on the water’s surface and the
transfixing close-ups of boys’ faces, which so often go on longer than you
expect, because Brook was always waiting for something real and unexpected to
transpire. If the film still gives us the chills it’s partly because of this
attention to the real, not improvisation per se—that’s too actorly a term—but
rather flickers of genuine thinking, sweating, stumbling, singing, worrying.
These characters never seem less than real kids, living it up while the adults
are away—and ready to resume niceties the moment an adult shows up.
No comments:
Post a Comment